Employment Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words - 2

Employment Law - Essay Exampleor non? If it is proven that he is a regular or permanent employee, his right for continuing in the avocation would be very genuine unless he is indulged in illegal activity or unethical intrust at work place. Various tests have to be applied for determining the nature of mull performed by tomcat. In the become, it was mentioned that he was non able to avail the sick leave and pension benefits which suggests that he is not a regular employee. Moreover, Tom was assured of at least 20 training sessions which also indicates that his job is more of a contractual in nature. In case of his inability to attend the sessions due to his sickness, on that point is a clause for substituting him with another personal trainer with the permission of the lodge. This also indicates the intention of the comp all to utilize the services of the personal trainers on contractual basis. If one trainer fails, the other one should conduce care and as long as this proc ess continues, the smart set will not have to painfulness about the job of any personal trainer. Hence, in this context, the company has to clarify on which proper(postnominal) grounds, Tom was terminated and it has to explain the reasons for its conclusion on poor job performance. According to the contract law, once the harmony was do, the terms and conditions should be accurately followed and in cases of minor exceptions sufficient justification has to be provided. If it is not ground on the proper justification, Tom should file case against Unfit Ltd. For removing him which comes under partial practice. The case mass be filed against the Unfit Ltd. as it violated both English contract law and unfair contract terms act (1977) (Ole Lando et al., 2003 ). The length of service is not in favor of Tom as it is very short i.e. one year and so his nature of job may not be considered as regular and hence he will not be entitled to pension and other retreat benefits as declared by the company in its regulations. In addition, he was made responsible for his tax income payment and insurance payment and he rather agreed to work on self employed basis to get tax benefits which indicates that he is not a regular employee in the company. His working conditions would be completely guided by the contract made between him and the Unfit Ltd. However, it doesnt give any right to company to remove an employee with out quoting proper and logical reason. In the present case study, the company abuses that Tom terminated with immediate effect due to persistent poor job performance. However, more specific details are not available and there is a need for the company to prove this and thence only the termination of Tom may be considered as fair. Hence, Tom may file a case against Unfit Ltd. As it violated the principles of European contract law (The commission on European contract law, 1999) In addition, the removal process must be in conformity with the contract clauses mad e between the Unfit Ltd. and Tom. There are different clauses like requirement of wearing an uniform supplied by the company, requirement of utilizing the companys equipment and support staff, allocation of atleast 20 sessions for personal training of the companys employees. In the present case, there is no evidence that Tom violated any one of these clauses and hence his termination is illogical and he can claim in court of law against the Unfit Ltd. for unfair dismissal. The company dismissed Tom with out any notice which is also not fair and violation of the contract made